Not to keep picking on Senator Nelson but…let’s talk about that purity test.

Is Senator Nelson trying to appeal to both sides of the aisle? He will garner Democratic support with an anti-drilling stance but surely his negative views on Obama’s efforts to revive our struggling national economy will broaden his appeal to a more conservative voter?

Unlike the Republican Party, the Democratic Party has not yet instituted a “purity test” . See links for GOP purity test:

http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474977917473

http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2009/11/republicans-seek-to-impose-purity-test-on-candidates.html

…If they did, I can think of a few Democrats…Nelson included, who would fail. I can also think of a few Blue Dog Democrats who would pass the GOP version of the test!

What would a Democratic purity test look like, you ask?

Well, I could paraphrase and revise the “Resolution on Reagan’s Unity Principle for Support of Candidates” to fit a more Democratic perspective….and say exactly the opposite of each item.

1 – We support government for the people, by the people.
2-We support healthcare reform that provides coverage for all Americans.
3-We support green energy reform.
4-We support workers’ unions.
5-We support humane immigration laws and reforms.
6-We support our troops even when we do not support the war(s).
7-We support nuclear disarmament treaties and continued diplomatic action.
8-We support marriage between any two people who want to build a life together.
9-We support real health care reform that respects human dignity and does not curtail a woman’s right to choose.
10-We support intelligent and diligently implemented gun control.

Does that about cover it? The GOP boiled it down to ten statements. I think the ten statements I have listed represent a Democratic perspective. What would you include?

News coverage of Senator Nelson’s statements on drilling and Obama’s economic reform efforts:

http://www.news-press.com/article/20091125/FLORIDA_OIL_DRILLING/911250396/1002/NEWS01/Senator-Nelson-slams-Obama–Gulf-drilling

 

Of course, you might ask…is it even consistent with prevailing Democratic ideology to consider something like a “purity test”? Probably not…

Similar Posts:

4 Comments to Not to keep picking on Senator Nelson but…let’s talk about that purity test.

  1. doorworker's Gravatar doorworker
    26 November 2009 at 13:32 | Permalink

    Good post.

    Must say, I’ve all along said that the GOP base voter efforts to pressure for a more clearly-defined conservatism (what often is referred to as ‘conducting purges’ or whatnot) is not objectionable politics at all. WHAT they want to see policy-wise is gruesome, yes, but that’s a separate issue.

    I would even venture to say that I think recent history (i.e. the last year of national politics under Obama) the Dems need this sort of housecleaning a great deal MORE than the GOP.

    Which brings the issue back to our tepid dishrag of a Senator, Mr Nelson. “The less repellant one”.

    Am I the only one surprised Nelson hasn’t taken any heat for his outing as a member of this Christian-authoritarianism cult/”bible study group” known as “the Family”? I could’ve puked when I read that he was one of this wingnut bastion’s few Democratic members. It speaks volumes about where old Bill is going to come down on tough reform issues when push comes to shove.

  2. 27 November 2009 at 10:51 | Permalink

    yay! a purity list!

    I would change number 9 to “We expect women to have the same rights as men, including their right to choose their own health care (including abortion),” since number 2 covers health care.

    and 10, I think commonsense gun control is on par with commonsense traffic law and probably shouldn’t rise to the top ten. I know very few liberals who want to completely excise the second amendment from our Bill of Rights, so maybe number ten can touch on an education policy that’s been supported by liberals from Dewey to Nader – Education reform must elevate civic education to be on par with reading and writing skills.

  3. Pat Fowler's Gravatar Pat Fowler
    29 November 2009 at 14:04 | Permalink

    “Progressive” Democrats might read the charter of their party. The credo, in something like Article 9, section 16 or 17 has material that you might find useful.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Advertising

Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

Contact

  • E-mail Executive Director at quinnelk@hotmail.com

Subscribe to the FPC Blog

Catch Us On the Radio

Florida Progressive Radio

Schedule and Archives

Blast Off! Radio - with Sinfonian

Capitol Offense Radio

Crashing the States Radio

No Days Off - with Susan and Alison

2010 Candidate Interviews

Interview With An Activist 2009

  • Coming Soon!

All Shows

Florida Progressive TV

Florida Progressive Blogroll

Search the web

Google Search
Search FL Blogs

BlogNetNews.com

Awards


Winner 2008 Best State Blog



Winner 2008 Best Writer, Kenneth Quinnell



Winner 2008 Netroots Activist of the Year, Alison Berke Morano



Winner 2008 Best Post, It's Not Called the Hate Amendment for Nothing - Kenneth Quinnell



Winner 2008 Best Ongoing Series, Stories to Read



Winner 2008 Best Online Radio Show, The Big Show with Alison Berke Morano & Kenneth Quinnell



Winner 2007 Netroots Organization of the Year

Blog Florida Blue

we101

This blog is a production of Florida Progressive Coalition, LLC